By Rupert Wesson
Diplomacy has been in our thoughts a great deal of late due as much for it’s absence as for it’s presence.
British Prime Minister Edward Heath once described a diplomat as “a man who thinks twice before saying nothing” which is of course to misunderstand diplomacy entirely. Diplomacy is about achieving results and is perhaps more accurately characterised by the phrase “diplomacy is the art of letting someone else have your way” and that of course is never achieved by mute passivity. It is also worth adding that American “humourist” Will Rogers was quoted as saying that diplomacy is often described as the art of saying “nice doggy” while quietly looking for a stick. This neatly highlights our differing approaches to diplomacy and dogs.
The British would not claim to be the best diplomats in the world but our approach to this vital art has not been without influence. We would acknowledge that this is probably a result of our history and our national character. Our Empire building era meant that English is the lingua Franca of diplomacy which puts us in a position of advantage. It is almost certainly the direct cause of our poor track when it comes to learning a second language. We also have some innate traits, tropes and characteristics which serve the cause of diplomacy rather well. If nothing else we are a nation that has mastered the strategic use of formality, understatement, polite phrasing and self deprecating humour. Finally, we may not be a nation famed for the finesse of our hospitality but we do at least understand the importance of a well-timed cup of tea.
The UK is no longer the military super power it once was but at least it can still punch above it’s weight when it comes to soft power. Whether it is monarchs or marching bands; pubs or Paddington we know how to leverage our cultural phenomena to serve the cause of positive global influence.
The British trait of politeness is admired around the globe and is an essential tool for all diplomats. We are always ready with an apology be it to people, pets or indeed even the furniture. In addition our language is by default carefully considered, measured and no more direct than it needs to be. When it comes to delicate negotiations direct language is only used once agreement is reached. Indirect language is essential in order to guide everyone towards that point. It is worth noting that the British might be best described as “mid table” in the linguistic league of directness. That is to say we are much less direct than most of the Anglophone countries but much more so than most of Asia. This position affords us a certain global reach.
Then there is pragmatism. Effective diplomacy recognises that perfection is rare and compromise is inevitable. Striking a deal that works “well enough” for all parties is often far more valuable than holding out for an ideal that may never materialise. Foreign diplomats who observe the uncompromising perfection of our marching bands are delighted to discover a more pragmatic approach to negotiations.
As of today we may not be the leading power of the globe but our history and character have shaped the wider nature of global diplomacy and we would argue, for the good.
| What we say | What we want to say | What is understood |
| That is an interesting idea | You are stark staring mad | They think it is an interesting idea |
| With all due respect | I think you are out of line | They respect us |
| I’ll bear that in mind | I have already forgotten what you have just said | They will think about what we have said |
| Could I perhaps suggest…. | You do not have a choice | They are giving us a choice |
| I’m sorry! It is possible I did not express myself very well | You’re being stupid | They have not been clear and they are trying again |
| Could I suggest some minor amendments | Let’s start again, this is going to take forever | We are making progress, we are nearly there |
| It is a well intentioned suggestion | It is naïve and dangerously stupid | It was a positive contribution |
| Could I interject for a moment ? | Stop talking I have heard enough | They want to ask questions on what I have said before letting me continue |
| Recollections vary | We all know that was not what was said | I am not being directly challenged on what I have said |
Our history and deep knowledge of protocol and etiquette mean Debrett’s are uniquely placed to provide coaching and training for diplomats, diplomatic missions and indeed anyone conducting business with British and overseas governments.
The Debrett's Coaching team provide entirely bespoke training programmes, crafted to your goals. The Diplomacy programme covers topics such as:
If you would like to enquire about our bespoke coaching courses, follow the link below to our contact form. Alternatively, email [email protected] with your enquiry.
For those who wish to go further.
Debrett's membership opens the door to our complete library of etiquette guidance - from the nuances of the British social season and correct forms of address, to expert business coaching and social conduct for every occasion. Free membership is available to all, with immediate access to the full breadth of our content.
Paid members also enjoy access to the Debrett's Peerage database - the most comprehensive record of the British aristocracy available. The subscription is priced at £9.99 a month or £99.99 a year.